It’s said, “Opinions are like arseholes everyone has one.”
I go further and say that if you had to look at all the arseholes, they all look different and have a characteristic look with an individuality of their own. It is not necessary that the most beautiful woman will have the best-looking arsehole. Similarly, it’s not necessary to have the best opinions from a highly educated person.
The objective of my opinion
I want to stimulate the minds of the followers of
‘Sanatan Vaidik Hindu Dharma’ with a realization that in the last 15000
thousand years, Hinduism has existed with the trials and tribulations of time.
The British and the Mogul invaders distorted the views of an average
Indian by introducing a hatred for the Hindu scriptures.
First, let us understand Hinduism
- Hinduism is a democratic ideology
representing the science of the supreme entity or is an open-minded discipline.
It is a discipline that does not use force on its follower. Hinduism is a class
in itself in the compatibility of religions around the world. It has evolved
with all living things on this planet over the last 12 thousand years.
Bhagavad Gita is a poem that describes Hinduism in a nutshell that is nearest to our era or Yuga. Chapter 11 of the Bhagavad Gita stimulates your audio-visual senses to understand the cosmic image of Krishna. Chapter 15, it stimulates your intellect to understand the conscious working of the Universe where Krishna is identified as consciousness; the supreme personality of God Head or Purna Purushottam or grand Self or Brahman in the domain of the cosmos and chapter 17 has a language of consciousness to interconnect. (A the unified field that carries a vibration classified as OM or the langue of the creator.)- Understand firstly what Dharma is. Dharma is
one’s personal path in life with truth or righteousness, the fulfillment of
which leads to the awakening of consciousness.
- Fear - The word "fear" includes
also such states of mind as insecurity, despair, and grief, all of which arise
from a realization of oneself as limited and separate from others and which
therefore can be dispelled only by realizing oneself as the all.
The five Yamas listed by Patañjali in Yogasūtra 2.30 are:
Ahiṃsā (अहिंसा):
Nonviolence, non-harming other living beings.
Satya (सत्य):
truthfulness, non-falsehood.
Asteya (अस्तेय):
non-stealing.
Brahmacharya (ब्रह्मचर्य):
chastity, marital fidelity, or sexual restraint.
Aparigraha (अपरिग्रहः):
non-avarice, non-possessiveness.
At the beginning of Patanjali’s eight-fold
path of yoga lays the Yamas: the moral, ethical, and societal guidelines for the
practicing yogi. These guidelines are all expressed in the positive, and thus
become emphatic descriptions of how a yogi behaves and relates to her world
when truly immersed in the unitive state of yoga. While we may not strive to
reach such a pure state ourselves, the Yamas are still highly relevant and
valued guides to lead a conscious, honest and ethical life.
Patanjali considered the Yamas the great,
mighty, and universal vows. He instructs us that they should be practiced on all
levels (actions, words, and thoughts) and that are not confined to class,
place, time, or concept of duty (YS 2.31).
Ahimsā
is about walking a non-violent path. Non-violence begins with a thought. If we
learn to ignore the negative chatter of the mind, we are less likely to harm
others with our words or actions. When negative thoughts and feelings arise,
who does it hurt? You! Learn to ignore them by having the opposite thoughts and
feelings. Ahimsa applies to your āsana practice, too. Avoid the competitive
urge to muscle your way through each pose aggressively, pushing yourself to
extremes, by meeting resistance with joy and equanimity. Be kind to yourself,
take one step at a time, and enjoy the process of gradual transition.
My opinion of Gandhi refers to the excellent western
ideology to produce bureaucrats to harvest the seeds they sowed to produce a
slave nation. The British Raj only encouraged the economical loot from India by
weakening the Hindu beliefs and destroying all the old Hindu systems This
continued by having a puppet government of the Nehru dynasty claiming the
Gandhian ideology with secularism as a lollypop to rule the millions of confused and enslaved Indians. If not, the British economy would have collapsed
overnight because of its dependence on raw materials from India. Many years
after the Indian independence the British still depended on Indian raw
materials.
Of course, it’s not India but the British who with the fake media
made Gandhi great and then the Indira Gandhi government. The British
researchers realized that;
- Hinduism
encouraged intellectual people like God and so followed them with blind faith
- Hindu faith is the strongest as it believes in
Dharma and having the freedom of choice many other religions took advantage of
it and especially the Europeans.
- Introduced
the Aryan theory and divided the people of India by the color of their skin
and claimed that they were also of Aryan descent.
- To
empower a slave was to corrupt them and Gandhi was ideologically corrupt knowing
that he was just seeking fame and so was Nehru who wanted to rule. This is when
RSS eliminated Gandhi from the riddle.
- Gandhi
was a poor decision-maker and a poor manager and morally corrupt so the
oppressors and the capitalist Imperialists took advantage of the situation.
The brilliant plan worked out for the British Raj with
Gandhi as a scapegoat.
- Give nonviolence a place in the minds of the Hindus
in India and the blacks in Africa, so that they will not revolt against the
oppressors. Only 2 people followed this ideology Martin Luther King Jr in America
and Mandela in South Africa and it worked. Yet nonviolence has no place in
Hinduism. Gandhi glorified this word with the help of the British media.
- Spread hatred for the black skin so that the
white-skinned will be considered superior. This comes from the holy bible. All
non-christens are slaves and a code of conduct is given in the Bible on how to
deal with the slaves. Hindus never had hatred for black skin. Our
acceptance comes from Bhagavan Shree Krishna, Again a British ideology to divide
and rule on the color of the skin because nearly all dark-skinned people were not christened. It was in South Africa that Gandhi realized the isolation of the
Black and white and decided to do something about it rather than fighting the
root cause, the invasion of Africa by the Europeans.
Gandhi also became a victim of the false Aryan theory developed by the British that gave the British the upper hand persuading
many Indians that the Indian knowledge was inherited from the white race of
Europe and that they were the superior race
Some
“white” Christians have used the Bible to convince themselves that owning
slaves is okay and that slaves should obey their “earthly masters.” Regrettably
and shamefully, “white” Christians have frequently taken verses of Scripture
out of context to justify the most despicable acts. In some cases, it could be
argued that these people were not really Christians; they were not really born
again but were adhering to a form of Christianity for traditional or national
reasons. Nevertheless, we have to concede that there are genuine “white”
Christians who have believed the vilest calumnies about the nature of “black”
people and have sought support for their disgraceful views from the pages of
the Bible. https://answersingenesis.org/bible-questions/doesnt-the-bible-support-slavery/
Please read and educate yourself on the reality of world history.
The Bible identifies different categories of slaves including female Hebrew slaves, male Hebrew slaves, non-Hebrew and hereditary slaves. These were subject to different regulations. This allows me to say the all Christens followed the bible and ruthlessly attacked and destroyed all non-christen populations looting and taking women and children as slaves. The Europeans were and are bankrupt nations.
·
Install fear and hardship for non-christens
to empower their wealth. Arjuna was a good example who did not want to fight
because of fear. British used this ideology to install fear, divide and rule.
The division of labor amongst the population of the Hindus suited the rulers
to divide and rule the Indians.
Gandhi
was quick to identify the division which was created by the Muslims and
Christens and glorified it in the interest of the world. So I say, Gandhi,
an
opportunist, with the help of the British, was the creator of the caste system
in India and the world.
Note; What is caste. ... The
root of caste is the Latin castus, which means "chaste" or
"pure, separated." The word arrived in English through the Portuguese
casta, which means "race" or "lineage," and was first used
in the 1700s in reference to Hinduism's system of social stratification.
In Hinduism, the Varna system
in Dharma-shastras divides society into four varnas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas,
Vaishya and Shudras). Please it is not a caste system what the world sees it
as.
·
The British lowered the Hindu religion to the
lowest values to create hatred for its followers and it succeeded. First, they
destroyed the education system of India (The
west made our Swamis a bunch of stooges to spread a false ideology so that they
can rule especially in the congress days. Makes me think that Gandhi was only a pawn,
there was much more to come with the Congress government brainwashing all
Indians to consider the white-skinned British to be the best in a secular
democracy. The Aryan theory is a false theory created by the British to
separate the Black and the white-skinned Indians. This has trickled into normal
families like ours, where our way of the reason is polluted. Think around and see
the hatred for the Hindu religion. This was done by speeding the Gandhian
philosophy.)
·
The Mughal rule was beneficial to the
Europeans as Islam has one leg in the Bible it is from the Quran. This
allowed the British to break the backbone of Hinduism not knowing its deep-seated roots.
Christianity and Islam have
different scriptures, with Christianity using the Bible and Islam using the
Quran, however, Muslims believe that the Gospel was also sent by God. Both texts
offer an account of the life and works of Jesus. Hence they are sympathizers of
each other but not Hinduism.
- ·
Most of the Swamis of Hinduism with the help
of the ruling government, in their talks promoted, nonviolence, nonattachment, and desirelessness, and encouraged Christianity and Islam in the daily lives of the Hindus. This
made the Hindus sit back in a comfort zone and enjoyed the slave rule of the day
by celebrating the European or Christen festivals forgetting their Hindu
roots. The Hindus of today are ashamed of their religion. Gandhi was one of
them who wanted to compromise with other religions hence the followers still
worshiped Gandhi to this very day. In that manner, the Hindus will always be a
slave and the objectives of the west are achieved.
- When the British realized that Subhas Chandra Bose was about to execute his attack on them, they quickly made Gandhi the most famous freedom fighter and boosted his self-pride of Gandhi through the British media, and left hastily by promising the world to Nehru. Nonviolence was to be only practiced on the oppressors but created hatred for the Hindus and the Muslims with violence. Gandhi got carried away with the media limelight and gave in to the Muslims as desired by the British.
- This has been repeated by the west with Martin Luther King Jr in America and Mandela in South Africa and it worked. The world media still gives this three the highest honor to avoid a revolt of the oppressed with violence.
Why
have the whites of the west not practiced nonviolence?
- ·
There are statues of Gandhi and Mandela
around the world just to brainwash the people into believing that they were
great freedom fighters and all should follow their ideology at the expense of
the freedom which they do not have. Yes, nonviolence is only for the blacks and
not for the whites. Nonviolence is now a cult. I say Gandhi and the media with
fake news are responsible for this cult.
·
The world only sees Gandhi and Indian history
from a perspective of either of a white or of an Upper Caste. That's how
information has been spread around the world. The world has been fooled by these
white people especially the cunning British who still have their wings spread in
the colonized countries. The congress party lead by Indira Gandhi was
instrumental in creating disrespect for the Hindus but was thrilled to be
called the daughter of the great man. Many people in South Africa still
considered Indira Gandhi as the daughter of the freedom fighter.
- During my studies in India, in one of the holidays, my maternal uncles just came from East Africa and I spent a week touring the surrounding area. I was very upset to know that during British rule, most of the entrances of the towns and villages had bars serving liquor. This was evidently mastered by the British. The average person was taken in and made an edict. In this way they spent most of their earnings on drinks, taking them deep into poverty. It was a perfect way to make slaves. The revenue collected in the sale went back to the rulers. The British Raj was only interested in taking the cotton away from this area leaving nothing but poverty. The most needed health care and education were never presented to the masses as the loot by the foreigners went on. It was after independence that there was a prohibition of liquor. Old habits die hard and the edicts ruined the families bringing total poverty. It was here the Indian history lessons paid dividends. Numerous invaders in a couple hundred years made a country of milk and honey into slavery and poverty. “Why?” Just for the sake of wealth which could be translated into money in a far-off land. The early form of barter did not provide transferability and divisibility and did not make trading efficient. The colonial rule made the medium of exchange money, to facilitate its popularity. It was prepared to believe that this would assure the people of peace and prosperity. Unfortunately, it was just an illusion. I realized, that by looting a wealthy nation the individual lost their well-being. Having seen the poorest of the poor and the ultra-rich, I was confused with mixed emotions. Having observed people, their attitudes, and lifestyles I came to one conclusion, “Education will improve one’s standard of living.”
- When the British left the country, the aim of the British Raj was achieved. The poor education system, destruction of all ancient knowledge and loot the wealth. The Mogul rule developed the slums of India, supported by the British to make slaves. The saddest fact is that the Mogul rulers with the aid of the sword destroyed ancient temples and looted the gold from their safes in the name of religion and not money. As a student of Indian history, I was astonished to note that India never attacked and captured another country or a nation in its existence of 8000 years. The biggest genocide was of the Indians and not of the Jews, nullifying the white man’s claim. British wrote the history books for India in its favor to show superiority and to humiliate the slaved Indians. Gandhi was the greatest opportunist and enjoyed the fame and false praises from the Europeans with a devastated country.
- When I returned to South Africa a similar pattern was observed having beer halls in the entrance of the locations where the black people lived. The education system for the blacks was to create slaves and edicts. Insulting names were given to Indians and black South Africans, like Kaffir and Coolie to disrespect their dignity and the world did nothing about it.
Note the British brought in
these names from their colonies. 1790, from Arabic kafir "unbeliever, infidel,
impious wretch," with a literal sense of "one who does not admit the
blessings of God," from kafara "to cover up, conceal, deny, blot
out." Technically, "non-Muslim," but in Ottoman times it came to
be used almost exclusively for "Christian." Early English
missionaries used it as an equivalent of "heathen" to refer to Bantus
in South Africa (1792), from which use it came generally to mean "South
African black" regardless of ethnicity, and to be a term of abuse since at
least 1934.
Coolie; both meanings of “unskilled Asian laborer” are found almost exclusively in historical contexts, suggesting imperialistic exploitation of these workers. But coolie is still current as an insulting term used to refer to a person of Asian descent, especially in South Africa. In India an unskilled labourer or porter hired for low or subsistence wages mostly on train stations are still a common site.
- It is only after the Modi government the true
history of India’s Independence is brought to the limelight. The question was
which phase of our freedom struggle won us Independence? Mahatma Gandhi’s
1942 Quit India movement The INA army launched by Netaji Bose to free India
or the Royal Indian Navy Mutiny of 1946? According to the British Prime
Minister Clement Attlee, during whose regime India became free, it was the INA
and the RIN Mutiny of February 18-23 1946 that made the British realize that
their time was up in India.
- The Quit India Movement of Gandhi practically died out long before 1947 and there was nothing in the Indian situation at that time, which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry.
- The RIN Mutiny was treated as a crisis of the empire by an alarmed British cabinet and Attlee Clement ordered the Royal Navy to put down the revolt.
- Mahatma Gandhi criticized the strikers for mutinying without the call of a ‘prepared revolutionary party’ and without the ‘guidance and intervention’ of ‘political leaders of their choice’. This is what the British liked and made him a hero by the theory of nonviolence.
Personal note; Mohandas Karamchand
Gandhi was a mentor and a hero of my illiterate father. I grew up with many of
his teachings and values that inspired our family growing up with the
foundation of Sanatan Dharma. Having learned the history of India and as a
student of the Bhagavad Gita, my matured mind reasoned some obstacles to Gandhi’s policy of non-violence.
The Hindus were and are great warriors
and they always believed in violence to solve a problem when all other means
failed. The great Mahabharata war is a notable example of the truth-seeking
Hindu. The British studied the violent past of India and feared their
destruction, found a pawn in the chess game named Gandhi to be used for their
own prosperity and it worked out by installing a Muslim sympathizer Nehru
government. The so-called secular government in 74 years made the Hindus of this
great nation confused idiot.
Knowing the history of South Africa I
admired the fighting spirit of the Zulus and compared it with the warrior
tribes (Kshatriyas) of India. Yet again they were destroyed and are lost in the
pleasures of the western world.
